Affiliate Window

You are here: Home > Affiliate Industry News > The Mighty G Follows PayPal's Lead

The Mighty G Follows PayPal's Lead

When Google Checkout launched many moons ago, it sent curious shock waves around the merchant side of the web. Would it kill PayPal? Would loyal PayPal users make a switch?

The novelty with Google Checkout was the tiny percentage it charged to merchants for each credit card transaction. Sales up to 10 times the percentage of any AdWords spend was free and thereafter each transaction was charged at 1.5% + £0.15 per transaction. Compare this to PayPal's standard of 3.4% + £0.20 per transaction and you'll see why there was so much interest.

But alas, an innocent looking email now blows all that out of the water.
 
Be it the credit crunch or basic economics, Google have now had to impose some changes which will apply as of the 5th May 2009.

They are now to use the PayPal business model exactly:

Google Checkout Fees

The chargeback fee will be £7, the same as PayPal too.

The only real difference is that Google state:

An additional 1% fee will be assessed on transactions where the merchant's country is different from the buyer's billing country. With 10 days notice, we may also charge higher transaction processing fees to merchants that incur excessive chargebacks or otherwise pose financial risk to Checkout.
It's this 1% on top of the new fees that will lose Google some custom.

I for one will switch back to PayPal-only transactions for sites like Price Tapestry Templates which attract international transactions.

This move by Google was probably always inevitable but by hiking up the fees so much and pricing themselves above the competition (international transactions) in this kind of industry will not be liked by many.

Keep up-to-date quickly and easily. Subscribe to my RSS feed or better yet, subscribe to my aggregated affiliate marketing RSS feed - 30 respected UK affiliate bloggers all compressed into one simple RSS feed!

You may also be interested in reading:

5 Comments

Comments are manually approved and hence can a while to appear. Questions, informative posts, and feedback comments are gladly accepted. Spam is deleted. Spam-type comments have their links removed (Comment Policy)

James

Very strange that, presumably, having looked at all their costs and determined a required profit margin etc Google manages to come up with exactly the same price structure as paypal.

Surprised the competition authorities aren't looking into this a bit more closely.

Written on Thursday 12 March 2009 at 14:02:38 GMT (Permalink)

Rob Barham

I had the same thought as James,

I remember when airlines said it was coincedental that they came up with the same airfares, fuel surcharges etc but eventually they got charged with price-fixing.

Nice templates by the way. Did you enter the latest sunshine macbook air competition?

Written on Thursday 12 March 2009 at 21:49:59 GMT (Permalink)

David

@Rob Barham - How could I not?!!! I built a plugin rather than a template although I did pay a lot of attention to the appearance ;-)

It was my first foray into the world of Wordpress plugins, so it took a while to do.

It was certainly an enlightening experience and has opened up the route of creating Wordpress widgets galore!

Did you enter?

Written on Friday 13 March 2009 at 10:15:16 GMT (Permalink)

Murray Newlands

It is standard practice for lots of new product / service releases to launch with a low price to get market share and then increase prices once they have it so we should not be too surprised. But yes it is a shame.

Written on Sunday 15 March 2009 at 02:30:53 GMT (Permalink)

David

@Murray Newlands - I certainly agree. By offer such a low price, they gained massive exposure but this is obviously unattainable when the company is tightening it's belt, so to speak. A price hike was probably inevitable but matching (and exceeding for some transactions) PayPal's rates was somewhat of a shock. I would have expected at least a 1% reduction (or scrapping the £0.20 fee per transaction element) to hold the position of "cheapest" between the two.

Written on Sunday 15 March 2009 at 12:09:35 GMT (Permalink)









Enter the URL without the http:// part else your comment won't be saved.





RSS Feed

Search DavidFiske.com